Bend over and take it from Google
Posted on March 3rd, 2008 by DotComMogul under Google, SERPSWelcome. If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Don't forget to leave a comment. I * DO * FOLLOW so you get a link back.
As long as we’re talking about links, this seems like a pretty good opportunity to talk about a simple litmus test for paid links and how to tell if a paid link violates search engines’ quality guidelines. If you want to sell a link, you should at least provide machine-readable disclosure for paid links by making your link in a way that doesn’t affect search engines. There’s a ton of ways to do that. For example, you could make a paid link go through a redirect where the redirect url is robot’ed out using robots.txt. You could also use the rel=nofollow attribute. I’ve said as much many times before, but I wanted to give a heads-up because Google is going to be looking at paid links more closely in the future. Matt Cutts
Relevance is an illusion Google wants to maintain
We are led to believe that Google’s war on paid links is to keep it’s search engine results relevant. We know only too well that those of us who are monetizing their blogs with paid reviews and text links are at risk of losing any page rank they might have achieved and of being buried somewhere deep in the Google black hole of death … all because we dare to make Google more irrelevant than it already is. It’s a cause and effect that enrages webmasters who want to rate well in the world’s dominant search engine. Many feel this is part of a ploy to force them to buy ads on Google to get noticed.
How Relevant is This Google?
Let me show you a very typical example of Google’s relevance that has nothing to do with paid links or reviews. Below is a screenshot of the current Google Hot Trends page.

I clicked on the first Hot Trend, Richard Kuklinski, an infamous Mafia hitman known as the Ice Man. Notice that there are three blogs that Google has chosen to list under Blog Posts for the “Hot Trend” Richard Kuklinski. Notice also that 2 out of the three are nothing more than Splogs. Not only are they splogs, but they are Google splogs … Blogger blogs. The very first splog simply bypasses the splog altogether and redirects to a completely irrelevant page shown in the second screenshot below, “Get a Free Samsumg 42″ HDTV”, “Get a Free Laptop Computer”, “Get a Free Canon EOS Digital Camera” … well, you get the idea.

In addition, many of the splogs that Google rewards with high rankings in the search engine results are “Made For Adsense Splogs” … yep, Google’s very own paid links on pages designed to rank high for certain keywords with little to no other content other than Adsense.
The examples I have shown are every day occurrences in Google Hot Trends. I check it daily and the results are always the same. The first page blog posts are indexed at lightening fast speed after an item goes hot.
They are obviously scraper sites that scrape the Google Hot Trends constantly and autopost as soon as the newest Hot Trends appear. If it’s really all about relevance, why doesn’t Matt Cutts get his panties all in a bunch over the shocking gaming of the Google Hot Trends?
Not only would he have us believe that bloggers who do paid reviews are messing up Googles’ relevance, but he also wants us to turn in our fellow bloggers if we find them publishing paid reviews or paid links. Basically, he’s asking us to do his job for him and be a back-stabber in the Blogosphere as well.
Come on Google. We aren’t that stupid.
It’s seems an obvious conclusion to me that Google’s heavy handed punishment of publishers who use paid links to monetize their sites (outside of Google’s own paid text links) is nothing more than an attempt to crush its advertising competitors, particularly with Google’s ad clicks being on a downward spiral since the end of last year.
Are You Just Going to Bend over and take it from Google?

It’s pretty obvious that Google will continue on the warpath against paid linking. Paid linking is a big threat to Googles own online advertising and website monetization products, AdWords and AdSense. It’s in Google’s best interest to keep fighting it.
This will drive paid linking further underground. With Matt Cutts trying to pit blogger against blogger by asking them to report paid links to Google, it’s obvious that it’s currently impossible for Google to determine whether a link is a paid link or not. Regardless of the penalties, most bloggers are not going to settle for the paltry income that Adsense provides most of them.
What’s a Blogger to Do?
As a publisher you have to make a choice between selling paid links or following Googles standards. Most advertisers will not advertise on your site if you have a nofollow in the links. Here are some things you can do to help you stay under Googles radar and hopefully avoid a penalty.
- Hide your paid links within posts, blending them seamlessly with ordinary content.
- Use services that don’t require code installed in your blog theme. Broker your deals behind the scenes.
- Don’t plaster Paid Review ads all over your site. Be discreet.
- Don’t use headings like Sponsors or Paid Reviews or Sponsored Links on your site
- Don’t depend solely on Google for your traffic. By developing other traffic channels, if the worse happens and Google slaps you with a penalty, you still have your other traffic sources.
- Lastly, here is a brilliant trick for the non-technically challenged amongst you.
Eventually Googles PageRank will become meaningless and third party measurements will be developed to take its place. Many believe that it already is meaningless. I would agree except that many advertisers rely on it and still want to advertise on sites that are ranked in Google, but as new measurements are developed that will change.
Popularity: 14% [?]
















March 3rd, 2008 at 3:19 pm
wow. This post really deserves a stumble. Will also digg btw.
bloggers should read this.
Rome’s last blog post..Onidex Venezuela
March 3rd, 2008 at 9:50 pm
Though you provide much thought and precise accuracy, there’s just one thing that really cripples us all and that is the monster called Google! They are a few steps ahead of the now hurting Yahoo, but they do call the shots. Page Rank is not as relevant to me as the actual traffic channels I use to increase my blog sites potential for visitors.
Great blog!
March 4th, 2008 at 8:56 am
I hate the fact that Google has so much say in how “relevant” our websites and blogs are. I’m not an anarchist or anything, but it just totally stinks that the fate of our site being found online is tied to page rank and getting found in Google.
What really bothers me about the whole situation is that Google started from small roots just like many of us trying to make a living online; I think they have forgotten where they have come from.
B Carter’s last blog post..Creating My New Blog - One Million Pet Pics
March 5th, 2008 at 9:58 am
I’ve used Google Hot Trends a fair bit to find out what topics or keywords people are searching on and I use to wonder why some of the blog posts that gets returned sometimes did not relate to the topic/keyword I was looking at??? With this post, it now makes sense, thanks for filling me in!
Marie’s last blog post..Blippr, Flugpo and Flickrspy
March 10th, 2008 at 10:38 am
I got a PR4 and PR3 blogs penalized. I hope to regain it in the next round of updates.
ceblogger’s last blog post..Vote For Me, Again!
March 13th, 2008 at 8:13 am
sir, i love your google tricks! i will try this soon. ur projectwonderful is kinda expensive
Glenn’s last blog post..7 Last words
March 19th, 2008 at 5:16 pm
Our sites being found online isn’t really on PR but I agree about google having a hand in it.
Rome’s last blog post..Googel and Gogle is Google? Googol What?
March 25th, 2008 at 12:00 am
re: B Carter - I totally agree with you. I just posted on Google’s URL policies. Why can’t Google let the market organize itself more? Can you imagine if your local city council decided to not let two stores of the same brand (think Starbucks or Shell) locate within say 1 city block of each other? Google would call this overpopulating results and deem it not relevant, and deny the second store a license.
Where I live in Vancouver there is a single street corner with no less than 3 Starbucks occupying the four corners of the intersection. All three have been there for a few years, and are doing quite well. This would never be allowed on Google - as for absolute sure, users only ever want to see one of each possible choice! argh…
Jonathan’s last blog post..Google’s Repressive URL Policy
April 21st, 2008 at 2:40 am
Google took my manhood.
10-4 Hillbilly Willy
Hillbilly Willy’s last blog post..IRS STEW - Government is eating us up!